-->

Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs

April 20th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

decemberists-crane-wife-2lp.jpg

The cynic in me blames Capitol Records for Side 1 of the Decemberists’ Crane Wife not sounding its best. I assume the major label cut costs on the vinyl manufacturing and all us crack pot record lovers have to suffer.

When I first pulled the record from its sleeve it caught the light in a way that revealed mold release residue spots like dusty finger prints all over the playing surface. When I spun the record on my Music Hall MMF-5 turntable, it had a definite warp. Dropping the needle confirmed the warps sonic signature: noise, pops and snaps with every 33 1/3 rotation.

Shu-shuk, shu-shuk, pop.

I’ve never heard Crane Wife before, not on CD, MP3 or internet radio. Beyond the rough surface noise the album presented a nice, clean soundstage with good separation between the many layered instruments. Colin McCoy’s voice, though, sounded hard, as in hitting the ceiling flat to the point of caustic distortion. Again, with no reference point, I don’t know if this is in the recording (done with the iZ Tech 24 track RADAR V, 24 bit/192 kHz at Chris Walla’s Hall of Justice), pressing or if I need to bust out the mirror, mini-torques, magnifying glass and bright lights and re-align my cartridge. I hate it when a new software title makes me doubt my hardware, I usually find the hardware was fine all along and the software is just buggy.

This noisy record has inspired me to investigate $40 DIY record cleaner machines again. I hope my local Goodwill has the right components to harvest: ice cream maker, air pump, vacuum cleaner with a 10 amp motor and a turntable platter. If I cannot find the right parts I can always spend $159 on a KAB EV-1 manual RCM.

Just as the turntable’s needle hit the run out groove, Beth arrived home from some quick Target shopping. “This new Decemberists album sounds terrible, so noisy,” I showed her the record and tried to get the right reflection angle so she could see the smudges. “Yeah, that’s bad,” Beth has an expert eye as she used to grade used vinyl for a living in the Nineties. As we were checking it out I also noticed how carelessly the label was affixed to the record and picked off some fine vinyl shavings from the record’s edge. “Plus, it’s warped.”

I slid the record back into its sleeve and returned it to my shelf. I was looking forward to listening to the whole album, but got discouraged in the first 15 minutes. I even pulled out all my acoustic treatments and carefully placed them around the room. Now I had to remove them back to the laundry room storage.

I probably won’t play the album again until I find or build a cleaning solution. This hobby is frustrating and rewarding.

Popularity: 9% [?]

del.icio.us:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs digg:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs blinklist:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs reddit:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs fark:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs Y!:Major Label Vinyl Disappointment - Dirty Mint LPs

Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition

April 3rd, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

I keep reading articles with harsh statements like: “So, I put the record on the turntable, dropped the needle and, let me tell you, it sounded terrible!” or “I’ve never listened to a digital source and been able to relax, you can only really enjoy music through analog playback.” Why are we presented with such a black and white music listening world? Why can’t we strive for the best playback possible through analog and digital paths?

Continue reading Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition

Popularity: 6% [?]

del.icio.us:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition digg:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition blinklist:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition reddit:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition fark:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition Y!:Analog Versus Digital Music - Not an Either-Or Proposition

Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement?

March 30th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

hercules_tunesexplorer.jpg

My Sony PSP frustrates me. As a long distance remote in my listening room for my iTunes upstairs, it can be very slow when loading Coverbuddy/iTunes album art web pages. I have to wait for all the little album thumbnails to load on the page before I can pick the album I want and I guess because of the PSP browser’s poor caching every bit of the UI loads fresh including the play and skip buttons. The PSP/Coverbuddy combo is almost free so I put up with its clunkiness.

In moments of frustrated weakness, limited gadgets like the Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller look very attractive with its simple monochrome text display and scroll wheel:

Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller: The Hercules Tunes Explorer Wireless is yet another USB wireless iTunes remote control, but with a twist. It integrates a small back-lit LCD screen which ‘displays the song titles, play lists etc’ and so allows you to ’select your music without having to go to your computer.’ It has a side mounted thumbwheel for scrolling and since the device is RF and not infra red it is not limited to line of sight. I can imagine this could be a very handy little device for controlling your den computer from the bedroom, for example (provided of course that it’s compatible with the Airport Express).

The Hercules Tunes Explorer Wireless is €49.99 (~$65) and is PC as well as Mac compatible.

[Via Playlist]

I’ll stick with my PSP for now, but if you don’t have any iTunes remote the Hercules could overcome the feat.

(Via The Unofficial Apple Weblog.)

Popularity: 11% [?]

del.icio.us:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement? digg:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement? blinklist:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement? reddit:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement? fark:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement? Y!:Hercules Wireless iTunes Controller - PSP Replacement?

The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD

March 29th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

More than a year ago I made a promise to myself that I would stop buying CDs and only buy vinyl and downloads. Since no independent record shops exist in Chicago’s western suburbs (I hope to change that someday soon), this promise has been difficult to keep. The only vinyl source close to my day job is Virgin Megastore, their selection is hit and miss and their prices are normal retail if not a few dollars higher. Other Music owner, Josh Madell, envisions recorded music’s future without CDs, with only downloads and vinyl LPs left. From Wired’s Listening Post:

WN: Do you think CDs and MP3s can co-exist peacefully, sort of like the way vinyl and CDs live in harmony at your store?

Madell: Hard to say. CDs in some ways seem outdated next to MP3s. But as hard drives and players become more powerful and smaller, and internet connections improve, I could imagine CDs becoming of less interest. I think the time is not too far off where some releases come out on vinyl and MP3 only — no CD. But who knows.

Vinyl and downloads of the same album is the perfect blend of ultimate consumer sound quality (vinyl; not to mention album sleeve art, liner notes and resale value) and compromised convenience (digital downloads without the restriction of DRM).

Continue reading The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD

Popularity: 8% [?]

del.icio.us:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD digg:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD blinklist:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD reddit:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD fark:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD Y!:The Future of Recorded Music Media - Not So Fast CD

New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems

March 26th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

hi-performance-audio-book.jpg

Robert Harley, the Absolute Sound’s editor in chief, has written a new book: Introductory Guide to High-Performance Audio Systems: Stereo - Surround Sound - Home Theater. Because so few books exist on my main topic of interest, high end audio, I already ordered it, sight unseen. I’ve learned many listening and system building skills from Harley’s previous books. I hope this new volume contains new information and isn’t simply a Reader’s Digest version of the other books.

Of the book’s contents, the inclusion of the now dead DVD-A and SACD optical coaster format is worrying, one would hope for some speculative coverage of HD audio on Blu-Ray and HD-DVD. Amazon’s description:

How to choose, set up, and enjoy the latest high-technology audio systems are all given expert insight in this indispensable guide for stereo shoppers. Consumers today often use home-audio systems for both stereo music and surround-sound music, they buy multichannel systems instead of two-channel stereo systems, they may have HDTV and flat-panel televisions, and they have largely moved to in-wall and on-wall loudspeakers rather than floorstanding units. Questions relating to all of these changes are covered in a novice-friendly way, as well as Super Audio CD, DVD-Audio formats, and all of the latest surround-sound formats for home theater. The emphasis is not only on solving shopping dilemmas, but also on getting great sound from an audio system.

Continue reading New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems

Popularity: 9% [?]

del.icio.us:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems digg:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems blinklist:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems reddit:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems fark:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems Y!:New Book - High-Performance Audio Systems

Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System

March 24th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

arcam_rdock.jpg

Arcam is now selling the rDock, their audiophile iPod dock (not sure what the “r” stands for). The dock is part of Arcam’s Solo series of highly regarded integrated entertainment centers (not furniture but combo CD/DVD/processor/pre-amp/amplifier). Plus you can control the iPod with the Solo’s remote.

For $300 USD, the rDock sports high end electronic pre-amp components (fancy op-amps), vibration damping case, overbuilt, double regulated power supply and sturdy AV jacks. As most audiophiles know, steady battery power always beats dirty AC from your wall plug with blacker backgrounds and reduced digital hash. The rDock will not charge the iPod while music is played because Arcam feels the charging process introduces AC mains noise and degrades the sound quality of your Apple Lossless, WAV and AIFF songs (if you are listening to any lossy songs on your iPod then why are you buying Arcam gear?).

Continue reading Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System

Popularity: 7% [?]

del.icio.us:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System digg:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System blinklist:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System reddit:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System fark:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System Y!:Arcam rDock Mates iPod with Solo Home Entertainment System

Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg

March 19th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

Nirvana-In-Utero-Bass-Trebl.jpg

I stopped by Virgin Megastore to fruitlessly shop for Broken Social Scene and TV on the Radio on vinyl Friday. Browsing through the book section I found the 33 1/3 book series. Each book is devoted to a different classic album. I was looking for Pixies Doolittle, but found Nirvana In Utero.

In Utero is one of he most frustrating recordings I own: my favorite Nirvana songs, recorded by Steve Albini and Bob Weston, but mastered for FM radio in a ‘78 Ford Fairmont by Bob Ludwig. To paraphrase Steve Albini’s opinion of the mastering, “…compressed dynamic range, closed down stereo image, reduced bass and treble…” Essentially, the final master approved by the band and Geffen had a sonic bell curve applied to it, appealing to the lowest common denominator.

The 33 1/3 book stated that bootlegs of Albini’s original recording exist and some versions of the vinyl LP contain the original. Searching ebay turns up domestic and UK pressings but no description mention a different mix on either. Nirvana fan sites don’t list the Albini sourced bootleg in their “Outcesticide” series. I’m losing hope that the original mix is available on any recorded media (or is so rare on limited vinyl pressings that it is lost to time).

Continue reading Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg

Popularity: 10% [?]

del.icio.us:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg digg:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg blinklist:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg reddit:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg fark:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg Y!:Nirvana - In Utero CD Liner Notes Reveal Tone Control Easter Egg

David Fincher’s Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems

March 12th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

Zodiac_448x190.shkl.jpg

My parents visited last week to see their grandchildren and offered to babysit a few nights so my wife and I could go out on some much needed dates.

On the second date we went to see David Fincher’s Zodiac. As usual, the movie theater experience was less than satisfactory. I was distracted the whole 160 minutes of the feature by red light blooms on each bottom corner of the screen (I assume from EXIT signs, how dare the theater choose fire safety over my videophile ideals?). In the film’s many darkly lit scenes the red reflections were the brightest element in my vision. I also didn’t appreciate the jabber-jaws sitting two seats to our left (what luck with only like eight people in the entire theater).

Zodiac was shot in HD digital and then processed with slight de-saturation and sepia for a vintage 70’s look (to my eye, more detail on the Cinematographers’ Guild (click on magazine and then find the 3/2007 issue with the Zodiac article)). A problem I had with this style is a complete loss of color in dark scenes and shadows o brighter scenes. The effect looks like a gray-green posterization in the shadow of a face that should be a deep brown as in the screen cap above). The reason this look bugs me is that it’s a common artifact of an underexposed, noisy digital still camera image. It just looks like a mistake rather than a pleasing effect. Other movies that exhibit this artifact include Zathura and Serenity. (My real gripe with this “dead shadow” look is I thought it was my projector’s fault, or more specifically, my custom calibration of the projector, as I’m more confident about my calibration skills now, I know it’s the sources’ fault.) I saw a film print of Zodiac so maybe there was a problem with the digital printing to film, though I doubt it, we’ll see if the DVD looks different.

Other than my visual quibbles I really enjoyed the content of the film. The murder scenes are very point blank, matter of fact and Fincher slo-mo detailed all at the same time. All the investigation and theory bits reminded me of one of my favorite movies: All the President’s Men. Every performance was great, including Jake Gyllenhall as obsessed and unreliable cartoonist/crime author Robert Graysmith (intrigued by the film, I read Graysmith’s first book Zodiac in a few days, then I was confused by some differences between the book and film and found the Zodiac Killer site where message board members fact check Graysmith’s books and shoot holes in many of his accounts which are twisted to fit his prime suspect. The Zodiac wiki may be more objective.)

Popularity: 7% [?]

del.icio.us:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems digg:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems blinklist:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems reddit:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems fark:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems Y!:David Fincher's Zodiac and Digital Cinema Problems

Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice

February 26th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

belkin-monoprice-HDMI-switch.jpg

It looks like everyone’s favorite super-expensive ethernet cable company, Belkin, are inflating the price of their $199 HDMI Interface 3-to-1 Video Switch, the same OEM HDMI box as BetterCables and Comects’ Neptune (also favorably reviewed by Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity, described as “inexpensive” at $222). It appears Monoprice has the same hardware for $67.46.

You have to ask yourself what premium you are willing to pay for branding from BetterCables and Belkin. As AV consumers we expect higher quality from our boutique brands. We assume that we are paying a higher price for their product because the company invested many hours on R&D and quality assurance. But what if that warm feeling is just a placebo caused by a rebadging of an OEM product? What if the only creative thought that went into these products was where to place your logo and how to spin the tech copy to justify its price and also scare you away from more affordable (or even fairly priced) alternatives (that look suspiciously like the same product).

Video switchers are not a sexy product, they are completely utilitarian. It’s awful that we even have to consider paying this much money for a boutique company’s product that is really an affordable OEM with the exact same functionality and performance. A backlash to industry wide HDMI price gouging is growing fueled by the extremely low prices of Monoprice and other discount cable suppliers (like RAM Electronics).

I assume as a response to my post this morning (and being featured on Gizmodo), BetterCables has removed the pricing and description of their HDMI switcher. I hope they explain themselves soon. The Secrets site was down this morning (coincidence?) but when they came back their review of BetterCables HDMI Switcher was unchanged.

Popularity: 4% [?]

del.icio.us:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice digg:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice blinklist:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice reddit:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice fark:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice Y!:Update - More HDMI Switch Controversy - Belkin vs. Monoprice

HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350?

February 25th, 2007 by Kyle Kolbe

HDMI_5x1_Compare.jpg

I’ve been on the lookout for an affordable HDMI switcher in anticipation of an additional HTPC and next gen console (hopefully the Xbox 360 will have HDMI by this spring). Monoprice has a good assortment of HDMI switchers, and I’ve had my eye on their 5X1 Enhanced HDMI Switch, but it has been sold out for weeks (looks like they have them back in stock today). The switcher only costs $88.73 (with an “original value” of $299), so it’s a very attractive option. An AVS Forum member posted this thorough review and found no problems (like sparkling) all the way up to 1080p.

Yesterday, I read the BetterCables Display Magic 5×1 HDMI Switcher ($350) review on Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity. The reviewer, Kris Deering, found no fault with the switcher, comparing it in quality to the rest of BetterCables’ product offerings (high). He concludes:

BetterCables has always offered outstanding performance and quality in their products regardless of price point. The Display Magic 5.1 HDMI switcher continues that tradition. Regardless of the source I had connected to it, the unit passed the entire signal and didn’t tamper with it in any way. That is all you can ask of an A/V switcher. The flexibility this adds to a setup that is limited in HDMI switching is immeasurable. This product gets my highest recommendation.

Continue reading HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350?

Popularity: 3% [?]

del.icio.us:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350? digg:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350? blinklist:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350? reddit:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350? fark:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350? Y!:HDMI Twins: Is BetterCables Selling an $89 HDMI Switcher for $350?